Akbari, S., Heydari, J., Keramati, M. A., & Keramati, A. (2020). A mixed system of network data envelopment analysis to evaluate the performance of bank branches: An illustration with Iranian banks. International Journal of Business Excellence, 22(2), 198-212.
Afzalinejad, M., & Abbasi, Z. (2018). A slacks-based model for dynamic data envelopment analysis. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 429-444.
Amirteimoori, A., Kordrostami, S., & Sarparast, M. (2006). Modeling undesirable factors in data envelopment analysis. Applied Mathematics and Computation, 180(2), 444-452.
An, Q., Liu, X., Li, Y., & Xiong, B. (2019). Resource planning of Chinese commercial banking systems using two-stage inverse data envelopment analysis with undesirable outputs. PLoS One, 14(6), e0218214.
An, Q., Yang, M., Chu, J., Wu, J., & Zhu, Q. (2017). Efficiency evaluation of an interactive system by data envelopment analysis approach. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 103, 17-25.
Azizi, H. (2012). Efficiency assessment in data envelopment analysis using efficient and inefficient frontiers. Management Research in Iran, 16(3), 153-173.
Azizi, H., & Wang, Y. M. (2013). Improved DEA models for measuring interval efficiencies of decision-making units. Measurement, 46(3), 1325-1332.
Badiezadeh, T., Saen, R. F., & Samavati, T. (2018). Assessing sustainability of supply chains by double frontier network DEA: A big data approach. Computers & Operations Research, 98, 284-290.
Banker, R. D., Charnes, A., & Cooper, W. W. (1984). Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis. Management science, 30(9), 1078-1092.
Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W., & Rhodes, E. (1978). Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European journal of operational research, 2(6), 429-444.
Chen, C., & Yan, H. (2011). Network DEA model for supply chain performance evaluation. European journal of operational research, 213(1), 147-155.
Cook, W. D., Zhu, J., Bi, G., & Yang, F. (2010). Network DEA: Additive efficiency decomposition. European journal of operational research, 207(2), 1122-1129.
Doyle, J. R., Green, R. H., & Cook, W. D. (1995). Upper and lower bound evaluation of multiattribute objects: Comparison models using linear programming. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 64(3), 261-273.
Du, J., Zhu, J., Cook, W. D., & Huo, J. (2015). DEA models for parallel systems: Game-theoretic approaches. AsiaPacific Journal of Operational Research, 32(02), 1550008.
Ebrahimnejad, A., Tavana, M., & Mansourzadeh, S. M. (2015). An interactive MOLP method for solving output-oriented DEA problems with undesirable factors. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 11(4), 1089-1110.
Fare, R., & Grosskopf, S. (2000). Network DEA. socio-economic planning science. 34: 35-49
Fare, R., Grosskopf, S., Lovell, C. K., & Pasurka, C. (1989). Multilateral productivity comparisons when some outputs are undesirable: a nonparametric approach. The review of economics and statistics, 90-98.
Fukuyama, H., & Weber, W. L. (2010). A slacks-based inefficiency measure for a two-stage system with bad outputs. Omega, 38(5), 398-409.
Jafarian-Moghaddam, A. R., & Ghoseiri, K. (2011). Fuzzy dynamic multi-objective Data Envelopment Analysis model. Expert Systems with Applications, 38(1), 850-855.
Jahed, R., Amirteimoori, A., & Azizi, H. (2015). Performance measurement of decision-making units under uncertainty conditions: An approach based on double frontier analysis. Measurement, 69, 264-279.
Kabnurkar, A. (2001). Mathematical Modeling for Data Envelopment Analysis with Fuzzy Restrictions on Weights (Doctoral dissertation, Virginia Tech).
Kao, C. (2009). Efficiency decomposition in network data envelopment analysis: A relational model. European Journal of Operational Research. 192 (3): 949-962
Kao, C., & Hwang, S.N. (2008). Efficiency de composition in two-stage data envelopment analysis: an application to non-life insurance companies in Taiwan. European Journal of Operational Research. 185 (1): 418-429.
Kawaguchi, H., Tone, K., & Tsutsui, M. (2014). Estimation of the efficiency of Japanese hospitals using a dynamic and network data envelopment analysis model. Health care management science, 17(2), 101-112.
Khalafi, S., Khalilzadeh, M., Razaghi, S., & Vaezi, E. (2021). Investigating the impact of the internet of things on the performance of knowledge areas of project management. International Journal of Internet Manufacturing and Services, 8(2), 89-102.
Korhonen, P. J., & Luptacik, M. (2004). Eco-efficiency analysis of power plants: An extension of data envelopment analysis. European journal of operational research, 154(2), 437-446.
Liu, J. S., Lu, L. Y., & Lu, W. M. (2016). Research Fronts and Prevailing Applications in Data Envelopment Analysis. In Data Envelopment Analysis (pp. 543-574). Springer, Boston, MA.
Lu, W. M., & Lo, S. F. (2007). A closer look at the economic-environmental disparities for regional development in China. European Journal of Operational Research, 183(2), 882-894.
Saati, S., Hatami-Marbini, A., Agrell, P. J., & Tavana, M. (2012). A common set of weight approach using an ideal decision-making unit in data envelopment analysis. Journal of Industrial and Management Optimization, 8(3), 623-637.
Shi, X., Emrouznejad, A., & Yu, W. (2021). Overall efficiency of operational process with undesirable outputs containing both series and parallel processes: A SBM network DEA model. Expert Systems with Applications, 178, 115062.
Shahriari, S. (2013). A Network Data Envelopment Analysis (NDEA) Model to evaluate firm’s Strategic Entrepreneurship. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Tehran University, Tehran, Iran. (in Persian)
Sengupta, J.K. (1995). Dynamic of Data Envelopment Analysis: Theory of Systems Efficiency. Springer Science & Business Media. Netherlands
Tavana, M., Kaviani, M. A., Di Caprio, D., & Rahpeyma, B. (2016). A two-stage data envelopment analysis model for measuring performance in three-level supply chains. Measurement, 78, 322-333.
Tone, K., & Tsutsui, M. (2009). Network DEA: a slacks-based measure approach. European Journal of Operational Research. 197 (1): 243-252
Vaezi, E. (2021). Measuring the performances of Medical Diagnostic Laboratories based on interval efficiencies. Journal of Optimization in Industrial Engineering, 14(2), 153-170.
Vaezi, E. (2022). Performance measurement in the health care sector: A leader-follower network DEA model based on double frontier analysis. Scientia Iranica, 29(3), 1662-1684.
Vaezi, E., Najafi, S., Hajimolana, S., Hosseinzadeh Lotfi, F., Ahadzadeh Namin, M. (2020). Production planning and efficiency evaluation of a three-stage network. Journal of Industrial and Systems Engineering, 13(Issue 2), 155-178.
Wang, K., Yu, S., & Zhang, W. (2013). China’s regional energy and environmental efficiency: A DEA window analysis based dynamic evaluation. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 58(5-6), 1117-1127.
Wang, W. K., Lu, W. M., & Liu, P. Y. (2014). A fuzzy multi-objective two-stage DEA model for evaluating the performance of US bank holding companies. Expert Systems with Applications, 41(9), 4290-4297.
Wang, Y. M., & Chin, K. S. (2009). A new approach for the selection of advanced manufacturing technologies: DEA with double frontiers. International Journal of Production Research, 47(23), 6663-6679.
Wang, Y. M., & Chin, K. S. (2010). Some alternative DEA models for two-stage process. Expert Systems with Applications, 37(12), 8799-8808.
Wang, Y. M., Chin, K. S., & Yang, J. B. (2017). Measuring the performances of decision-making units using geometric average efficiency. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 58(7), 929-937.
Wu, J., Lv, L., Sun, J., & Ji, X. (2015). A comprehensive analysis of China's regional energy saving and emission reduction efficiency: from production and treatment perspectives. Energy Policy, 84, 166-176.
Wu, J., Zhu, Q., Ji, X., Chu, J., & Liang, L. (2016). Two-stage network processes with shared resources and resources recovered from undesirable outputs. European Journal of Operational Research, 251(1), 182-197.
Zhou, X., Luo, R., Tu, Y., Lev, B., & Pedrycz, W. (2018). Data envelopment analysis for bi-level
systems with multiple followers. Omega, 77, 180-188.